Speculation has been swirling in recent days about Nairobi County’s administrative strategies, with some reports hinting at a significant shift in the way local services are managed.
According to various media outlets, the county was allegedly negotiating to hand over certain key functions to the national government a move that would fundamentally alter the relationship between city hall and the State.
These reports, however, have now been met with strong denial from Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja, who dismissed the claims as unfounded and misleading.
Speaking to journalists at City Hall, the governor emphasized that the county remains committed to managing its responsibilities independently, in line with the Constitution and ongoing devolution frameworks.
“The narrative suggesting that Nairobi County is surrendering any part of its mandate is simply not true,” Sakaja said. “Our administration is focused on enhancing service delivery, not relinquishing our duties.”
- Matiang’i Speaks On Working With Sifuna To Defeat Ruto In Election
- Matiang’i Speaks On Leaving the United opposition And Joining Hands With Ruto Before 2027
- Matiang’i Finally Speaks On Being Uhuru’s Project Ahead Of 2027 Election
- Oburu Finally Reveals What Sifuna Did That Left Raila Very Angry
- Oburu Odinga Finally Reveals What He Did To Sifuna The Moment He Embarrassed Raila In Kakamega (Video)
Sakaja’s comments come amid a broader national conversation about devolution and the balance of power between county governments and the national executive.
Counties have increasingly engaged in cooperative arrangements with the national government, outright transfer of functions is rare and often requires legal and parliamentary approval.
The governor also addressed concerns raised by residents about service delivery, reiterating the county’s commitment to infrastructure development, public health, and urban planning initiatives.
He added that Nairobi County continues to explore partnerships that complement its resources and capacity, but these do not amount to handing over functions.
Political commentators have suggested that the media reports may have stemmed from misunderstandings of routine intergovernmental collaborations, which often involve technical and advisory support rather than a transfer of authority.
The governor’s office has also urged journalists to verify information before publication, warning that inaccurate reporting could mislead citizens and affect public confidence in local governance.
Sakaja concluded his remarks by highlighting the county’s ongoing projects, including road expansions, water supply improvements, and social welfare programs, framing them as part of a broader vision to make Nairobi a world-class city.
Our priority remains Nairobians,” he said, “and we will continue to exercise our mandate fully, transparently, and independently.
While the controversy has stirred debate online and in political circles, it appears that Nairobi County’s administrative authority remains firmly under the control of the city government, at least for the foreseeable future.
About the Author
