The tension surrounding Kenya’s political landscape took a dramatic turn after former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua made startling claims about his recent confrontations with police and unidentified individuals.
Speaking in a charged address, Gachagua painted a picture of a state increasingly intolerant of dissent, accusing the government of using force to silence him.
According to Gachagua, his political activities have been met with excessive resistance, including teargas and physical attacks, which he attributed to fear within the highest levels of power.
Gachagua did not mince his words. He alleged that President William Ruto fully understands his political strength and views him as a serious threat.
“Mimi napigwa teargas na kupigwa na wahuni na polisi kwa sababu mimi ndio niko na dawa ya kutoa William Ruto aende nyumbani,” Gachagua said, declaring that the harassment he faces is proof of the President’s fear.
He insisted that Ruto knows him very well and is deeply uncomfortable with his influence.
The former deputy president framed himself as the embodiment of political resistance, portraying his struggle as one not just personal, but symbolic of a broader fight against what he described as state sponsored intimidation.
Also Read
- I Worked Hard for Years Without Promotion Until I Found Help That Elevated Me at Work – Employee Shares Testimony
- I Kept Missing Big Tenders Until I Found Help That Made Me Win Contracts Easily – Contractor Shares Experience”
- From Earning Small Money to Handling Big Cash Deals, Here Is How My Financial Life Completely Changed – Businessman Shares Testimony
- Video: Simba Arati Gives Conditions That Must Be Achieved Before ODM Welcomes Back Sifuna
- Ruto Receives Bad News While In Italy As ODM Releases Unexpected Declaration
He argued that the use of police and alleged hired goons signals panic within the ruling establishment rather than strength.
Gachagua’s comments have reignited debate over the state of democracy, freedom of expression and the politicisation of security agencies.
His supporters argue that his treatment reflects an administration increasingly uneasy with internal dissent, especially from leaders who once formed the core of its political machinery.
The fallout between Ruto and Gachagua has evolved from quiet disagreement to open hostility, with both sides now speaking through rallies, symbolism and carefully calibrated public statements.
What began as ideological divergence has now hardened into a full-blown power struggle.
The government has yet to issue a formal response to Gachagua’s allegations. However, allies of the President have previously dismissed his claims as political theatrics aimed at gaining sympathy and mobilising opposition support.
As Kenya inches closer to the next electoral cycle, Gachagua’s bold declaration positions him as a central figure in the emerging opposition narrative.
Whether his claim of being the medicine to remove Ruto from power resonates with voters remains to be seen, but one thing is clear the battle lines are no longer blurred. They are drawn loudly, publicly and with increasing intensity.
About the Author
