President Ruto’s SHA Claims Spark Backlash After Paul Muite’s Scathing Response

Spread the love

President William Ruto has once again found himself under sharp public scrutiny after making bold claims about the success of his administration’s healthcare reforms.

Over the years, the President has made repeated promises, from championing the bottom-up economic model to now suggesting Kenya could mirror Singapore’s development path. However, many Kenyans argue that several of these pledges remain unfulfilled.

In his latest message, President Ruto highlighted what he described as a success story under the Social Health Authority (SHA). He cited the case of Naomi Mutendwa Kilunda, a single mother of six, whose 17-year-old daughter allegedly received specialised corrective surgery at Kenyatta National Hospital.

According to the President, SHA fully covered the KSh 168,000 medical bill and all post-operative care, with no out-of-pocket payments required. The statement was intended to demonstrate that SHA is working effectively for ordinary Kenyans.

Instead, the remarks triggered intense debate and criticism, especially after senior counsel Paul Muite weighed in. In a strongly worded reaction, Muite questioned the credibility of the President’s claims.

Also Read

He noted that positive reports about SHA seem to come only from the President and the Cabinet Secretary for Health, while Kenyans continue to organize medical harambees almost every week to raise hospital bills.

Muite further stated that he expected the President to address the persistent crisis at Kenyatta National Hospital, rather than selectively highlighting isolated success stories.

His comments resonated with many Kenyans who feel that the reality on the ground contradicts official narratives. Social media platforms quickly lit up, with mixed reactions ranging from frustration to ridicule, turning the President’s message into a subject of public mockery.

The backlash reflects growing concerns about the functionality of SHA and the broader credibility of government promises. To many citizens, it remains puzzling that the system appears to be “working” mainly in official statements, while everyday experiences suggest otherwise.