President William Ruto has ignited a fresh storm in Kenya’s political arena after openly criticizing Wiper Party leader Hon. Kalonzo Musyoka during a visit to Machakos County, Eastern region.
Speaking in a region widely considered Kalonzo’s political stronghold, the Head of State accused the former vice president of leading the area down what he termed as “a wrong political direction rooted in tribal politics.”
In a strongly worded address, President Ruto contrasted the Eastern region with Nyanza, which has traditionally been an opposition zone.
He noted that Nyanza is currently enjoying increased development projects, attributing this to the willingness of its leaders to work closely with his Kenya Kwanza administration.
“Development follows partnership,” Ruto said in the viral video. “When leaders come together and support the government of the day, their regions benefit. Nyanza is a clear example of what happens when we put aside politics and work for progress.”
Also Read
- Gachagua Reveals How Ruto Is Tactically Dividing Mount Kenya Region Ahead Of 2027 Elections
- Bad news For Wetangula And Mudavadi As Natembeya Reveals His Tactical Plan Starting This Week
- Gachagua Angrily Responds After Being Asked Why He Always Mentions Ruto In His Conversations
- Gachagua Reveals How He Tactically Avoided Ruto’s Trap After leaving USA
- “Miguu Niponye” Chaotic Scenes At Kasarani, Teargas Thrown At People During A Football Match
The President urged local leaders to set aside political affiliations and collaborate with his administration for the greater good of their communities. He warned that persisting with tribal-based politics would deny residents the benefits of national development programs.
However, Ruto’s remarks have sparked sharp reactions across the country. A section of Kenyans, particularly on social media, has questioned the fairness of his comments, arguing that development should not be tied to political loyalty.
Many demanded clarification on whether the President’s statement implied that only regions aligned with his government would receive development, while opposition strongholds risked neglect.
“Development is a constitutional right, not a political gift,” one commentator wrote online. “The President swore to serve all Kenyans equally, regardless of who they voted for.”
Others defended Ruto, suggesting his message was more of a political strategy aimed at encouraging unity and cooperation rather than an actual policy of discrimination.
They argued that his call for collaboration was in line with his broader “bottom-up” economic model, which relies heavily on partnerships between national and local leadership.
Kalonzo Musyoka has yet to respond directly to the President’s remarks, but his allies in the Azimio la Umoja coalition have condemned the statement as divisive and discriminatory.
Makueni Senator Dan Maanzo accused the Head of State of attempting to blackmail regions into political submission, warning that such rhetoric could deepen mistrust between government and opposition supporters.
“The President should be the symbol of national unity,” Maanzo said. “Threatening communities with development denial unless they support him politically is a dangerous path.”
The debate comes at a time when the Kenya Kwanza government is keen on consolidating national support ahead of the 2027 elections. Eastern region remains a battleground, with Kalonzo positioning himself as a key opposition figure and potential presidential candidate.
As the controversy continues to dominate public discourse, the remarks have reignited questions about Kenya’s longstanding debate over the politicization of development projects.
For many citizens, the central concern remains whether government resources are being equitably distributed — or whether political loyalty is becoming the new currency for progress.
