Kiambu Governor Kimani Wamatangi has broken his silence following the demolition of several businesses linked to him near Nairobi’s Nyayo National Stadium, alleging that the operation was politically motivated and aimed at derailing his 2027 gubernatorial ambitions.
Speaking at the scene in the early hours of Wednesday under tight police security, Governor Wamatangi insisted that he is the legitimate owner of the demolished properties.
He claimed the demolitions were part of a broader scheme to intimidate and silence him, arguing that powerful political forces were using state machinery to frustrate his leadership and distract him from serving the people of Kiambu County.
“I began here as a small boy selling tea and mandazis before growing into the business that stood here. What has happened is purely political and meant to intimidate me,” Wamatangi said. He maintained that the move was intended to weaken him politically ahead of the next general election.
Also Read
- From Darkness to Daylight: The Solar Switch Changing Kiambu County
- NBR Sounds Alarm: Why Using Cash as Party Décor Could Cost Rwanda Millions
- Shock in Parliament as Tanzanian MPs Fail Live English Test
- “Msitubebe Ufala!’ Ruto Takes On Leaders Planning Mass Protests
- Ruto Opens Up on Quiet Understanding with Raila That Changed Kenya’s Political Tone
The governor further vowed that the incident would not deter his political journey. “If anyone wants to be Governor of Kiambu, they should seek the mandate from the people, not through intimidation. I will not be intimidated, and I will vie without fear or favour,” he stated.
Eyewitnesses at the scene reported that police officers used teargas and live bullets to disperse crowds as the demolitions were carried out, heightening tension in the area. Despite the chaos, Wamatangi called for calm, saying he would not seek revenge and would instead pursue justice through lawful and peaceful means.
On whether any formal notice was issued before the demolitions, Wamatangi flatly denied receiving one. He challenged authorities to produce documentation if any existed. “There was never even a single day of notice,” he said, adding that he had operated in the area since 1994 under a valid lease, which he pays for monthly.
The demolitions have since sparked debate, with critics and supporters alike questioning the timing and motives behind the operation.
About the Author
