A legal battle unfolding at the Milimani Law Courts on Tuesday drew attention to a sensitive issue touching on professional regulation, immigration and cross border cooperation.
Lawyers, court users and observers followed the proceedings closely as arguments were made on a matter with implications beyond the individuals directly involved.
Appearing before the court, senior advocate Danstan Omari represented a group of foreign doctors from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) who are contesting issues surrounding their engagement and recognition to practice medicine in Kenya.
Through his submissions, Omari argued that the doctors were lawfully recruited and possess valid academic and professional qualifications from recognised institutions.
He told the court that despite meeting the necessary thresholds, the doctors have faced administrative hurdles that have effectively barred them from fully practising their profession.
Also read
- Big Relief for Kiharu Parents as Ndindi Nyoro provides this for free
- Hundreds of Traders Set for a Big Shift as Ruto Makes a Surprise Move in Laikipia
- Legal Storm Brews Over Doctors’ Right to Work in Kenya
- Activists Sound Alarm Over What’s Happening Behind the Scenes
- Big Education Push in Kiharu Sparks Hope Ahead of National Exams
Omari maintained that the actions taken against his clients were discriminatory and violated their constitutional rights to fair administrative action, equality before the law, and the right to earn a livelihood.
The case, filed under a certificate of urgency, challenges decisions and processes taken by local authorities in relation to a group of foreign professionals seeking clarity and protection under Kenyan law.
The petitioners argue that their livelihoods and professional futures are at stake, prompting the court to intervene.
According to court filings, the doctors have previously served in various healthcare facilities and were brought in to help address gaps in specialised medical services.
However, regulatory challenges and disputes over recognition of their credentials have left them unable to work, exposing them to financial strain and possible deportation.
Omari urged the court to issue orders compelling the relevant authorities to regularise the doctors’ status and allow them to practise pending the full hearing and determination of the case.
He further argued that Kenya, as a member of regional and international bodies, has obligations to uphold professional mobility and mutual recognition agreements.
The matter raises broader questions about how Kenya balances professional regulation with the need for skilled foreign labour, especially in critical sectors such as healthcare.
The court is expected to issue directions on the next steps, including timelines for responses from the respondents and a possible ruling on interim relief.
The case will be mentioned on a later date as the legal contest continues.
About the Author
