A charged exchange in the political arena has once again drawn attention to the growing tension between the government and the opposition, amid renewed scrutiny of public programmes and the state’s handling of youth related issues.
Speaking during an interview, Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna painted a grim picture of what he described as a widening gap between government commitments and realities on the ground.
He questioned whether recent agreements meant to cool political temperatures and restore public trust had translated into tangible safety and justice for young people across the country.
His remarks appeared to tap into broader frustrations, particularly among urban youth, who have increasingly voiced concerns about insecurity, economic hardship and political exclusion.
Sifuna argued that despite assurances of reform and dialogue, cases of police brutality and unexplained killings had not subsided.
He claimed that more than 20 young people had lost their lives since the signing of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between political actors, an agreement that was widely touted as a step toward easing tensions and safeguarding civil liberties.
According to the senator, these deaths raise serious questions about the sincerity of the commitments made and the government’s willingness to protect its citizens.
Beyond security concerns, Sifuna took aim at the NYOTA programme, a youth empowerment initiative funded by the World Bank.
Also Read
- Sifuna Speaks Out: Why Kenya’s Biggest Problem Starts at State House
- World Bank Funds or Campaign Cash? Sifuna Accuses UDA of Turning NYOTA into Rallies
- Unprecedented Rush! Why Politicians Are Scrambling for Ruto’s Party Tickets
- Night of Gunfire, Days of Silence: What the Government Is Now Doing in Isiolo
- Sifuna Breaks Silence on IEBC Shock Exit: “Let’s Not Rush to Judge”
The programme was designed to support young people through skills development, entrepreneurship, and access to financial resources.
However, the senator alleged that the initiative had been politicised, accusing the ruling United Democratic Alliance (UDA) of converting NYOTA resource distribution forums into partisan rallies.
He described this as a blatant abuse of public resources and a violation of the spirit under which donor funds are provided.
“What we are seeing is not empowerment, but exploitation,” Sifuna said, arguing that vulnerable youth were being used to advance political interests rather than being genuinely supported.
He questioned why oversight institutions and other leaders had remained silent on the matter, despite the seriousness of the allegations.
The comments are likely to intensify debate around the management of donor funded programmes and the neutrality of state led initiatives.
Civil society groups have previously warned that politicising development projects undermines public trust and risks jeopardising future international support.
As pressure mounts, calls are growing for transparency, independent audits and accountability to ensure that youth focused programmes serve their intended purpose rather than political agendas.
About the Author
