Discussions around taxation and the rising cost of living have once again taken centre stage as the government weighs new measures aimed at cushioning households from mounting economic pressure.
With wages stagnating for many workers and prices of basic goods remaining high, policymakers are under growing pressure to demonstrate sensitivity to the struggles facing ordinary citizens.
It is within this context that Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi has floated a proposal that could significantly alter the tax landscape for millions of Kenyans.
Mbadi has proposed exempting employees earning Sh30,000 and below from Pay As You Earn (PAYE) tax, a move that would effectively increase take home pay for a large segment of the workforce.
According to Treasury officials, the proposal is part of broader tax reforms intended to make the system more progressive while stimulating household consumption.
Supporters argue that freeing low income earners from PAYE would provide immediate relief, allowing families to better meet essential expenses such as food, rent, transport and school fees.
The proposal, however, raises critical questions about its impact on government revenue at a time when the exchequer is under strain.
Also Read
- Political Lines Drawn as Ruto Questions Opposition’s Game Plan
- Relief for Sugar Workers as Government Makes Fresh Pay Promise
- Murkomen Breaks Silence as Fresh Security Operation Targets Kainuk Bandits
- Mbadi’s Tax Idea Puts Low-Income Earners at the Centre of Reform
- Sh3.6 Million Christmas Tree Lights: Bungoma Spending Under Spotlight
Kenya is grappling with a widening budget deficit, rising debt obligations and growing demands for funding in sectors such as health, education and infrastructure.
Critics warn that exempting millions of workers from PAYE could reduce collections unless offset by alternative measures.
Mbadi has maintained that the Treasury is exploring ways to plug potential gaps through improved tax compliance, sealing loopholes and expanding the tax base rather than increasing the burden on low earners.
He has also indicated that higher-income brackets would continue to shoulder a greater share of income tax.
Economists remain divided on the proposal. Some view it as a bold step toward social equity and economic stimulation, while others caution that without parallel fiscal discipline, the policy could deepen pressures.
If adopted, the proposal would require legislative approval and could take effect in the next financial year, setting the stage for debate in Parliament. For many workers, the outcome of that debate could have an impact on lives.
About the Author
